I now disagree with Articles 13 and 11.

Article 1x

If there was an extreme version of Article 13 that would license thoughts, inventions and computer algorithms, it might be called Article 1x.

If people sang or thought of lyrics (or anything non-generic) which they had telepathically agreed to access using a handle (title) or choice (do you want to access it?) where telepathic self-control training would be provided, and free licences would exist.

Inventions (non-free licensed items, e.g. computers and reused items) could be licensed for a subsidised amount for a cancellable subscription or mind reading surveillance (for the use of that invention, perhaps using an electronic device).  Animals would need to have implants/their minds read to contribute thoughts as part of jobs to pay for services and products.

Computer programs would need to be made efficient and hardware simplified (YouTube based on breasoned shapes as videos, dreams with copyright content accessed by agreement by spiritual time travel mind reading, Prolog computers with simple operating systems but reused lines of code counted as accessed and unnecessary lines skipped).  Again, free licences, subsidies and universal pensions would exist.  Intellectual property of the self would cost x to access - x earned = 0.

Meditators would license meditation thoughts (excluding what the user's thoughts are) from a company, and payments to and from other meditators made.  Payment would be in proportion to the number of thoughts the meditator agreed to access, not other thoughts.  The demand for many thoughts is why algorithm writers would become popular in schools so that meditators can create their thoughts.

The government would foot the bill of over-thinkers who commented on others' thoughts, cancelling their breasoning currency debt.

Choosing not to access some thoughts and using paraphrasing software would solve the paradox of exhaustion of paraphrasing to avoid copyright thoughts.
The government would subsidise medicine (thoughts to solve problems with thoughts) in a perfect world.  The new economy would not rely on subsidised or free copyright filtering software and software development costs, but licensing of better-designed, viral content.  Simulated Intelligence would help Internet searchers find the correct information straight away.  Free versions would be necessary for some who ran out of credit.  Also, budgeting software would help use and earn more credit.

The Bible etc. are public domain, and in comments and thoughts on works, where the comments and ideas were already copyrighted to someone else a licence fee would be charged for accessing content

Spiritual time travel to mind read, and copyright customers' thoughts would be illegal because they belong to the customer.  Producers could at least interest customers in making the comments.

Small producers could ask for likes in spiritual Facebook, which would present posts and ads telepathically, and could be switched off.

The law should make judgements based on the first available timeline in the present.

Time-related copyright disputes should be resolved by either the time of writing or original according to the timeline (not plagiarised), determined by algorithms.

Secondary texts would have more expensive licences (if they cited work with a paid licence) than work with no citations.  A citation by itself would mean a licence was needed, even if the author quotes no content.  People who can't pay with a job would have a universal pension anyway, and people who had died would earn money, e.g. for 70 years (in Australia) until reaching a further decision.

People would want meditation because of increased longevity, business-related and other reasons.